20 Oct 2009

Judge Schiltz Holds Starbucks Tip Policy Violates Minnesota Law



While holding that plaintiffs (represented by Nichols Kaster & Anderson) cannot pursue their tip-sharing claim against Starbuck as a class action, the United States District Court, D. Minn. (Judge Patrick Schiltz), recently held that Starbucks policy violates Minnesota law. (Nichols Kaster & Anderson have brought similar claims against Caribou coffee and a Minneapolis strip club.)

Worthy of note from a practitioner’s point of view, after Judge Schiltz issued a ruling, Starbucks Counsel (Akin Gump) submitted a letter to the Court for clarification and the Court, the next day, wrote a letter back to Starbuck’s counsel with clarification (below).  Such streamlined communication seems highly efficient though lawyers might want to proceed with caution lest they be viewed as seeking to reargue lost motions or otherwise wasting the court’s time.  (In this case, it would seem defense counsel were not faulted for their request of the Court.)
Starbucks Schiltz Ltr Exchange

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Browse

    or
  • Sponsored Links

    Shepherd Data Services. Bred for Technology.
    Ikon. Document Efficiency at work.
  • Categories

  • DISCLAIMER

    Posts on this website have been written and displayed for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Additionally, posts reflect the personal opinions of the author, and are not the views of any past or present employer or institution with which the author may be affiliated. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Please do not post or send any confidential information here. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer you select are important decisions that should not be based solely upon the information offered on this website.