22 Dec 2009

Whitebox v. Compucredit: Noteholders v. Shareholders



Cancel the holiday plans if you’re counsel for Compucredit. Plaintiffs’ filed their eighteen-page complaint on Dec. 21 and the hearing on their motion for a temporary restraining order seeking expedited discovery is to be argued before Judge James Rosenbaum (D. Minn.) on December 29.

The causes of action are (1) a claim under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and (2) under the Georgia Corporate code.

The Minneapolis Star Tribune covers the lawsuit here.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Browse

    or

  • Sponsored Links

    Shepherd Data Services. Bred for Technology.
    Ikon. Document Efficiency at work.

  • Categories

    • DISCLAIMER

    Posts on this website have been written and displayed for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Additionally, posts reflect the personal opinions of the author, and are not the views of any past or present employer or institution with which the author may be affiliated. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Please do not post or send any confidential information here. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer you select are important decisions that should not be based solely upon the information offered on this website.