2 Mar 2010

Taking on University Employment Practices, One Plaintiff at a Time?



Earlier this year, Minnesota Litigator covered a Minnesota Supreme Court appeal argued by a Halunen & Associates attorney in an employment case against Capella University (here).  Yesterday, CourtHouse News Service reported about a new complaint, brought by a Halunen lawyer against the University of St. Thomas, in which plaintiff alleges she was terminated for having had a hysterectomy.  Plaintiff alleges that she was instructed that she would have to tell her supervisor the reason for her medical leave because, she alleges, her employer would view this as a form of birth control “against the church.”

The complaint is somewhat sprawling in its allegations of wrong-doing, supposed whistle-blowing, sexism, etc.   One might even refer to the complaint against the University of St. Thomas as a plaintiffs’ litany (and, of course, the ever-present prayer for relief).

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Browse

    or
  • Sponsored Links

    Shepherd Data Services. Bred for Technology.
    Ikon. Document Efficiency at work.
  • Categories

  • DISCLAIMER

    Posts on this website have been written and displayed for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Additionally, posts reflect the personal opinions of the author, and are not the views of any past or present employer or institution with which the author may be affiliated. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Please do not post or send any confidential information here. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer you select are important decisions that should not be based solely upon the information offered on this website.