8 Mar 2010

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Milavetz BAPCPA Case



Justice Sotomayor, writing for the Court, joined in full by six Justices and in part by Justices Scalia and Thomas, the U.S. Supreme Court holds that attorneys who provide bankruptcy assistance are debt-relief agencies under the bankruptcy abuse law (opinion is here) and that the BAPCPA (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act) does not violate the consitution in setting limitations on advice that “debt relief agencies” (including law firms) can give debtors.

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the underlying Eighth Circuit decision, siding with the dissenting Judge Steven Colloton.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Browse

    or
  • Sponsored Links

    Shepherd Data Services. Bred for Technology.
    Ikon. Document Efficiency at work.
  • Categories

  • DISCLAIMER

    Posts on this website have been written and displayed for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Additionally, posts reflect the personal opinions of the author, and are not the views of any past or present employer or institution with which the author may be affiliated. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client or similar relationship. Please do not post or send any confidential information here. Whether you need legal services and which lawyer you select are important decisions that should not be based solely upon the information offered on this website.