Professional Malpractice: It Happens.

Why is it that medical malpractice is seen (at least by some in our civic discourse) as a terrible scourge afflicting our society, driving up medical costs and clogging our court system with meritless lawsuits, some say?  But other kinds of professional malpractice seem almost invisible? Isn’t it ironic that medical malpractice claims, normally brought, of course, by lawyers, are singled out as particularly pernicious but legal malpractice… Continue reading

On the Challenge & Complexity of Attorney Malpractice Claims

A few weeks ago, Minnesota Litigator queried as to why medical malpractice claims are a widely discussed form of civil litigation but legal malpractice claims are relatively uncommon and inconspicuous but shied away from offering an explanation, which may have been wise self-restraint.  Now that is cast aside. The most obvious explanation for medical malpractice claims far outnumbering legal malpractice claims is that there are many more medicalContinue reading

Schedin v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. Heading to The 12-Person Jury

…s of the drug, an antibiotic. Levaquin included a warning but sometime after Schedin’s incident, the warning was changed and made more prominent (made into a “black box” warning in 2008).  Subsequent warning label changes would be a classic “subsequent remedial measure” inadmissible at trial if it were not for the fact that the label change was mandated by the FDA, U.S. District Court Judge John R. Tunheim has held. … Continue reading

The Simple Claim of a Harmful Side Effect/The Complexity of Federal Preemption of State Law Claims

The interesting fact pattern that gives rise to the problem in this case is what are the duties of a generic drug manufacturer if, after a drug’s initial federal approval (and approval (and then mandated use) of a specific warning label), new information comes to light about potentially harmful side effects?  Can a claim be brought against the manufacturer under state law for failure to warn? Gloria Mensing took a medicine, MCP, a gene… Continue reading

An Important Minnesota Ruling on Invasion of Privacy

Medical information was obtained regarding sexually transmitted diseases and an apparent adulterous affair, which “news” was posted on a MySpace page. The posting was brief and the number of people who saw the private information gleaned from hospital medical records presumably small. For that and other reasons, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The Minnesota Court of Appeals, in a published de… Continue reading

Affidavit of Expert Review Fatal to Med Mal Case (Yet Again)

Over the past year, Minnesota Litigator readers have been barraged with news of appellate decisions from the Minnesota Court of Appeals in which plaintiffs lose professional malpractice claims for failure to meet the requirements for affidavits of expert review (see here and here, for example). One cannot do an “end around” the statutory deadline requirement by suing the medical care provider directly, after having sued the medicalContinue reading

Tort Reform at Work: Minnesota's Affidavit of Expert Review Fatal to MedMal Case

A rather straight-forward statutory requirement of an affidavit of expert review to be filed with a medical malpractice lawsuit has resulted in the dismissal of many putative malpractice actions and, today, another one bites the dust.  (A similar requirement provides a threshold defense for other professionals under Minnesota law, here.) In today’s decision by the Minnesota Court of Appeals, the injured plaintiff failed to serve the a… Continue reading

Several Hundred Dollars To Treat Your Trees Followed By Dead Trees?

… cure the disease, and the company happily refunds the purchase price to that percentage of its customers who contract the disease (with a percentage of the payments from the healthy customers, of course). Pharmaceuticals and medical devices in this country are highly regulated to prevent such scenarios. Such a business model (healthy payors subsidize the unlucky subset of the sick payors) bears a resemblance to insurance, another heavily regulat… Continue reading

Alamo® (propiconazole) to “Prevent” Fatal Oak Wilt Infection? Really??

cure the disease, and the company happily refunds the purchase price to that percentage of its customers who contract the disease (with a percentage of the payments from the healthy customers, of course). Pharmaceuticals and medical devices in this country are highly regulated to prevent such scenarios. Such a business model (healthy payors subsidize the unlucky subset of the sick payors) bears a resemblance to insurance, another heavily regulat… Continue reading

The Challenges of Debt Collection and the FDCPA

…g debt-holders like Wells Fargo (“Checking and Much More“), State Farm Insurance (“Like a Good Neighbor, State Farm is There“), Kohl’s Department Store (“Expect Great Things“), myriad medical service providers (medical bills are often the origin of unpaid debt), or any business that sells a service or product to the public and would prefer not to be associated with the collection of debt. The inherent cha… Continue reading

Discoverability of Settlement Agreements

…never served discovery seeking the settlement agreements? At least in one recent federal court decision: (1)  Yes. (2)  No. (3)  No. For this post, Minnesota Litigator wanders outside its jurisdiction to highlight Volumetrics Medical v. Toshiba America Medical Systems, et al., a recent case from the U.S. federal court in the Middle District of Tennessee, where this issue came up.  The court’s analysis (Mag. Judge L. Patrick Auld) is straigh… Continue reading

Recycled Surgical Lasso Catheter Literally Heart-breaking

, motions to exclude experts (brought by defendants), and a motion to add a claim for punitive damages (brought by plaintiff). Summarizing the detailed 68-page opinion which should be required reading for anyone interested in medical device products liability, Judge Schiltz ruled in favor of Biosense, the original manufacturer, because it seems that plaintiff was unable to identify any actual problem with the catheter prior to its refurb.  For th… Continue reading