Winona Clergyman Tagged with $1 Million in Punitives

As reported in the Winona Daily News over the weekend, a jury in the Hennepin County District Court courtroom of Judge Bruce Peterson awarded a plaintiff represented by Robert J. Hajek $410,000 in compensatory damages, $1 million in punitive damages, against Donald Dean Budd, a former pastor at Winona’s McKinley United Methodist Church.  Budd was represented by Timothy Waldeck. Plaintiff had gone to her pastor to navigate the challenges of hard … Continue reading

AT&T Appeals Boundary Waters Cell Tower Ruling

Contributor Sara Peterson writes in: AT&T Mobile filed a notice of appeal this week with the Minnesota Court of Appeals in the dispute over their proposed 450-foot cell tower that would be visible from portions of the BWCA.  AT&T attorneys apparently plan to argue that the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA) does not preserve views from within the wilderness area to points outside, and may not apply to scenic and esthetic resources… Continue reading

Reversal of Fortune: A “180″ for U.S. Bank

…nk’s surprise, not only did it fail to win summary judgment but the trial court awarded summary judgment to the defendants who had not even moved for summary judgment.   This week the Minnesota Court of Appeals (Hudson, Peterson, Schelhas) reversed and awarded U.S. Bank summary judgment, including an award of attorneys’ fees. The unambiguous language in the limited-recourse provision provides that distributions would be credited first… Continue reading

Affidavit of Expert Review Fatal to Med Mal Case (Yet Again)

Over the past year, Minnesota Litigator readers have been barraged with news of appellate decisions from the Minnesota Court of Appeals in which plaintiffs lose professional malpractice claims for failure to meet the requirements for affidavits of expert review (see here and here, for example). One cannot do an “end around” the statutory deadline requirement by suing the medical care provider directly, after having sued the medical … Continue reading

Minn. Ct. App.: No Family Discount for Same-Sex Couple is No Violation of the MHRA

The Minnesota Court of Appeals (Kalitowski, Peterson, Halbrooks) affirmed Olmsted County District Court’s rejection of a Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) claim brought by a couple of women (the Monsons) who were rejected by the Rochester Athletic Club in their application for a family discount on their athletic club membership fee (given to families and married couples). The holding, “A claim for public-accommodations discriminatio… Continue reading

Criminal Prosecution of Putative Petters Judge Briber Affirmed, Notwithstanding Impossibility

Back in late 2008, Derrick Riddle appears to have thought he would be able to score some serious cash by proposing that he would facilitate a bribe of Thomas Petters’ trial judge for Petters’ criminal case. There were more than a few problems with the scheme, not the least of which was that, at the time of his proposal, no judge had been assigned.  On this basis, Riddle’s defense counsel raised the defense of impossibility.  Mi… Continue reading

“Eat What You Kill,” Incentives, Behavior…

…legislation targeted at shifting the model and changing the incentives.  The MPPOA took very strong exception to his testimony.  There was an exchange of letters thereafter (see here and here) (unsolicited suggestion to Chief Peterson: consider a less florid font for a hardly florid subject matter?). The Rochester Post-Bulletin coverage is here. The role of economic self-interest in decision-making is not generally challenged when laid bare.  It&… Continue reading

Advancement ≠Indemnification: Sue Someone And Advance Her Lawyer’s Defense Costs?

Employer believes its executive is stealing and fires her.  Later, employer sues executive for the misappropriated funds.  She answers, denying the charges, and making a demand that the employer advance the fees she is obliged to pay her lawyer for her defense, pursuant to Minnesota corporate statutes in defending the action (see, e.g., Minn. Stat. § § 302A.521, 317A.521 (for Minnesota Business Corporation Act and Minnesota Nonprofit Corporatio… Continue reading

Kelly v. City of St. Paul: RNC Protester Case Against Police Survives Summary Judgment (Barely)

… “roughly similar to [to being hit by] a ‘professionally-thrown baseball.’”) The issue in the case is whether the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, the police officers involved, specifically Officers Lucas Peterson, Ernster and unnamed officers “A-J,” deprived Kelly of his constitutional rights or were they just trying to do their job in the face of an unruly anarchic crowd. Kelly survived defendants’ motions… Continue reading

Catholic Church Alleged Abuse Cases: “International Priest Trafficking”

…w Ulm on behalf of alleged abuse victims.  And the Court went on to rule that no such obligation had been alleged, affirming summary judgment in favor of the Diocese. The Minnesota Court of Appeals (Judges Larkin, Wright, and Peterson, in an opinion by Larkin) refused to go as far as the Wisconsin Supreme Court in a similar case. While clearly sympathetic to plaintiffs’ claims, the Court concluded that any remedy the plaintiffs might have w… Continue reading