Personal Email, Privacy, & Work in Minnesota: What is the law?

As Minnesota Court of Appeals Judge Roger M. Klaphake ruled this past week, “Minnesota courts have not addressed whether an employee can have an expectation of privacy in a company email account, although other jurisdictions have examined this issue.  Conclusions are mixed.” Most employers and certainly all large employers have email policies.  These tend to set the ground-rules from the start, giving notice to employees that they sh… Continue reading

An Important Minnesota Ruling on Invasion of Privacy

…held “that the publicity element of an invasion-of-privacy claim is satisfied when private information is posted on a publicly accessible Internet website.” Also, the Minnesota Court of Appeals held that Minnesota privacy laws related to medical records, Minn. Stat. 144.291, is not preempted by the federal HIPAA statute (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). … Continue reading

Facebook Privacy Breach: The Inevitable Class Action Complaint & a Minnesota Tie

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) broke that back-dating story back in 2006, which, over the ensuing several years cost corporate America hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars.   The WSJ broke another story over the weekend that plainly would trigger lawsuits, which it has now done.  Time will tell whether the story and the privacy breach will open up another cottage industry or whether the contagion will be contained… The named pl… Continue reading

Redgrave LLP on E-Discovery: Proportionality, Privilege, Preservation, & Privacy

…or the Seventh Circuit needed expertise in connection with an e-discovery pilot project last month, they went to Redgrave LLP.   Redgrave’s “4 P’s of eDiscovery: Proportionality, Privilege, Preservation, and Privacy” is a particularly penetrating PowerPoint primer on the panoply of pitfalls faced by U.S. civil litigators. (Seriously, its a very useful resource provided by Redgrave’s highly focused lawyers. Here is an… Continue reading

Federal Bar Association, MN Chapter, January Presentation: Tunheim on Judicial Administration

… which Judge Tunheim has served for ten years, the past four as Chairman: Cameras in the courtroom; Audio recordings of hearings/trials; Electronics policy (next generation of CM/ECF); E-Government Act, transcripts, and privacy policy; Courtroom Usage Study; Data Storage & the National Archives; Translation of Court Forms; “Congested Courtrooms;” and  Administration and policy regarding national security cases. More el… Continue reading

Wrongfully Included on a “Watch-List”? A Recent Minnesota Defamation Decision

The proliferation of information through the internet has huge societal implications for privacy and reputation, which have been playing out for a decade and will continue.  (Cyber-bullying is a related phenomenon.) The law, of course, has recognized citizens’ interests in both privacy and reputation for years but how will recent social and technological changes affect this area of the law? (Minnesota’s seminal case in this area of t… Continue reading

The Simple Claim of a Harmful Side Effect/The Complexity of Federal Preemption of State Law Claims

The interesting fact pattern that gives rise to the problem in this case is what are the duties of a generic drug manufacturer if, after a drug’s initial federal approval (and approval (and then mandated use) of a specific warning label), new information comes to light about potentially harmful side effects?  Can a claim be brought against the manufacturer under state law for failure to warn? Gloria Mensing took a medicine, MCP, a gene… Continue reading

Schedin v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. Heading to The 12-Person Jury

…s of the drug, an antibiotic. Levaquin included a warning but sometime after Schedin’s incident, the warning was changed and made more prominent (made into a “black box” warning in 2008).  Subsequent warning label changes would be a classic “subsequent remedial measure” inadmissible at trial if it were not for the fact that the label change was mandated by the FDA, U.S. District Court Judge John R. Tunheim has held. … Continue reading

Levaquin Trial Begins Monday, November 15 Before U.S. District Court Judge Tunheim (D. Minn.)

…n that would have negatively affected levofloxacin sales in both Europe and the United States.  Over the past decade, there appears to have been increased concern about these medications and the communication of risk on their labels.  The label warnings have been increasingly emphatic.  Plaintiffs’ theories seem to be, in a nutshell, that the drug companies knew of the medicine’s risks and have steadfastly tried to understate or de-em… Continue reading

Alamo® (propiconazole) to “Prevent” Fatal Oak Wilt Infection? Really??

Were you sold a flare root injection regimen for a treasured oak or multiple oaks on your property to prevent oak wilt disease, only to have your tree die from oak wilt notwithstanding the hundreds of dollars (or more) spent on flare root injection? One label on branded propiconazole says,  “Preventive application is more effective than therapeutic treatment.”  Some companies that “administer” the flare root injections d… Continue reading

What Is the Trigger For Punitive Damages in Pharmaceutical/Medical Device Cases?

…rm or illness? As a first line of defense, pharmaceuticals and device manufacturers seek protection under federal regulation but there are ways for such manufacturers to game that system (by promoting, for example, “off label” uses or, theoretically, by duping federal regulators by other means (i.e., concealing or distorting data as to efficacy or side effects)). So the FDA may afford medical companies some protection, but that protec… Continue reading

Several Hundred Dollars To Treat Your Trees Followed By Dead Trees?

…njection regimen for a treasured oak or multiple oaks on your property to prevent oak wilt disease, only to have your tree die from oak wilt notwithstanding the hundreds of dollars (or more) spent on flare root injection? One label on branded propiconazole says,  “Preventive application is more effective than therapeutic treatment.”  Some companies that “administer” the flare root injections do so with a guaranty or warran… Continue reading